POSCO v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Choe-Groves, Judge:
*1351 This case reviews the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") methodology when selecting the highest calculated rate after applying facts otherwise available with an adverse inference ("adverse facts available" or "AFA") and Commerce's corroboration of those rates. Plaintiff POSCO ("POSCO") and Consolidated Plaintiff Nucor Corporation ("Nucor") initiated this action contesting various aspects of the final determination in a countervailing duty investigation, in which Commerce found that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Boomerang Tube LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Jbf Rak LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020