House v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, Justice.
Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and the-defendants in error were defendants in the trial court, and we will so designate the-parties.
Plaintiffs filed this suit in the district court of Montgomery county, Tex., in the-form of trespass to try title and for dam ••ages for oil produced and removed from a tract of 826 acres of land, a part of the Ransom House one-third league and labor. The land involved, known as the Madeley 826-acre tract, is in the Conroe oil field and is very valuable. By stipulation on the trial, the matter of accounting for the -oil which has been produced…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- White v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dull v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Dohoney v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Angell v. Bailey, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- Williams v. Kirby Lumber CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Craig A. Johnson v. Enerlex, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Debra Warner Angell v. S. A. Bailey, Jack Ellison, Their Unknown Heirs, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- Sharber v. FlorenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.