Szold v. Sickler
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In foreclosure proceedings a decree was rendered for the complainant. No error is made to appear except an allowance for attorney fees.
‘ ‘ There is no • allegatioñ in the bill of complaint nor any evidence to show that the complainant had any agreement whatever with his solicitor as to the compensation he should receive for his services in the cause. It is ordered that the cause be, and the same is hereby remanded with directions to the chancellor to reform the decree, by striking therefrom the provisions relating to the allowance of fees to complainant for his solicitor, and upon the decree…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brett v. First National Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Hatch v. TrabueSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Brooks v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Wright v. MerdesSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. South Florida Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931