Legal Opinion

Rouse v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1978No. 12283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204. On appeal, he argues that a pistol which is disassembled “is not a working gun,” and as a result cannot support a conviction under that section of the Code. We disagree.

I

The evidence presented by the government in this case was as follows. At approximately 7:50 p. m. on August 4, 1976, Detective Mathis and his partner, Detective Anderson, were investigating narcotics offenses. It was still daylight. The detectives drove their unmarked police cruiser into an alley, and pulled up to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Strong v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wynn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Curtice v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API