Washington v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Washington challenges his convictions for simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon (sawed-off shotgun). He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that to convict him of possession of the sawed-off shotgun, the evidence must establish that the shotgun was “operable.” We agree and reverse.1
Washington and Bush became involved in an altercation during which Washington pointed a shotgun at Bush. It was not disputed that the barrel of the shotgun was less than 20 inches in length.2 After a break in the affray, Washington…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lenaerts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.