Legal Opinion

Washington v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1985No. 84-1196PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Washington challenges his convictions for simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon (sawed-off shotgun). He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that to convict him of possession of the sawed-off shotgun, the evidence must establish that the shotgun was “operable.” We agree and reverse.1

Washington and Bush became involved in an altercation during which Washington pointed a shotgun at Bush. It was not disputed that the barrel of the shotgun was less than 20 inches in length.2 After a break in the affray, Washington…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Lenaerts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API