Legal Opinion

State v. Hampton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2001No. 69651-9PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

We are asked to decide whether sufficient evidence was presented by the State to conclude that a document, the filing of which was neither expressly nor impliedly permitted by any statute or regulation, comes within the scope of RCW 40.16.030.

Petitioner Charles Hampton (Hampton) was charged and convicted of the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in violation of RCW 40.16.030. On a motion by defense counsel, the trial court entered an order to arrest the judgment and dismiss with prejudice, finding that the State failed to provide evidence of any law of the State of Washington…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. Bel Air Equipment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. HamptonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API