Legal Opinion

State v. Hampton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2001No. 69651-9PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 P.3d 1035 (2001)

143 Wash.2d 789

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Charles R. HAMPTON, Petitioner.

No. 69651-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 18, 2001.

Decided June 7, 2001.

Robert Mason Quillian, Olympia, for Petitioner.

Ed Holm, Thurston County Prosecutor, Philip Lawrence Harju, Deputy, Olympia, for Respondent.

BRIDGE, J.

We are asked to decide whether sufficient evidence was presented by the State to conclude that a document, the filing of which was neither expressly nor impliedly permitted by any statute or regulation, comes within the scope of RCW 40.16.030.

Petitioner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. Bel Air Equipment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. BertrandWashington Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API