Legal Opinion
State v. Conte
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 2007No. 78995-9PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — The defendants, John Conte, Frank Colacurcio, Jr., Frank Colacurcio, Sr., and Marsha Furfaro, were charged with nine counts of violating RCW 40.16.030. The charges relate to campaign disclosure reports filed by three Seattle City Council members during their 2003 reelection campaigns. The State alleges that contributions made by some individuals to these council members were reimbursed in cash by the defendants. The State further alleges that as a result of the defendants’ scheme, the candidates filed false campaign disclosure reports because they did not identify the true source of the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Human Life of Washington, Inc. v. Chair Bill BrumsickleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Utter v. Building Industry Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BauerWashington Supreme Court · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.