Legal Opinion

Eulrich v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 1993No. 88-0708; CA A64027PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*28RIGGS, J.

Defendants1 appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff2 in this case involving a Snap-On Tools dealership and its termination. Plaintiff cross-appeals.

Plaintiffs claims of damages for fraud, breach of good faith and fair dealing and breach of contract arise out of a 1986 dealership agreement under which plaintiff sold Snap-On tools. We state the facts and draw inferences in a manner most favorable to plaintiff.3

Defendant Snap-On is a company that manufactures and sells hand tools to a nationwide network of dealers who in turn sell them to professional mechanics. Each…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Pierre Arboireau and Sandrine Arboireau v. Adidas-Salomon Ag, a Foreign Corporation and Adidas America, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Vanderselt v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Osborne v. Howard University Physicians, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Bennett v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API