Legal Opinion

Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 10, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

The Public Advocate appeals from an order entered by the Public Utilities Commission awarding Bangor Hydro-Electric Company $7,320,000 in rate increases associated with projected revenue losses for the rate or attrition year, that is, from March 1994 through February 1995. The Public Advocate contends that the industrial sales component of the Commission’s attrition1 award lacked substantial evidentiary support and its findings of fact were deficient pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 9061 (1989).2 We disagree and we affirm.

*1253In May 1993, Bangor Hydro filed revised rate schedules that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Maine Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. MAINE AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quirion v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Industrial Energy Consumer Group v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Pub. Advocate v. PUB. UTILITIES COM'NSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API