Legal Opinion

Matter of Welfare of Key

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1992No. 57562-2PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

The Benton County Superior Court declared 7-year-old Kirsten Key to be a dependent child within the meaning of RCW 13.34. Her mother appeals. She asserts that, absent a finding of parental unfitness, the dependency order violates her constitutional right to due process of law. We affirm the trial court, but find that most of the mother's concerns are met by our interpretation of the relevant statutes. Specifically, we hold that if the Department of Social and Health Services desires to move Kirsten against her mother's wishes, the Department must prove by clear, cogent and convincing evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mares v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API