People v. Whipple
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
The issue on this appeal is whether, when the People rest without evidence establishing an element of an offense, and the defendant moves for a trial order of dismissal on that basis, the trial court can permit the People to reopen their case and cure the omission. We conclude that reopening is permissible where the missing element is simple to prove and not seriously contested, and reopening the case does not unduly prejudice the defense. Because this rule did not, as a matter of law, preclude the trial court’s decision to let the People present limited…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. OlsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. VenturaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. BrujanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CestalanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.