Legal Opinion
United States v. Oxford Royal Mushroom Products, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 1980No. Crim. A. 79-211PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
All defendants have filed motions to suppress, omnibus motions to dismiss, motions to dismiss for multiplicity, motions to dismiss for duplicity, and motions for a bill of particulars. Defendant Bell has also filed a motion to sever. Defendants Oxford Royal Mushroom Products, Inc. and Fortugno have also filed motions to dismiss for violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d). An evidentiary hearing on all of these motions was held on January 14, 15 and 17, 1980, and oral argument was held on January 17, 1980. I stated findings of fact in open court on January…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc., Geronimo Villegas, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- O'LEARY v. Moyer's Landfill, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Concerned Area Residents for the Environment v. Southview FarmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.