Legal Opinion

Burndy Corp. v. Sealectro Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 12, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEAN, District Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the owner of a patent on a “coaxial cable connection,” that plaintiff’s product embodying that invention has been a commercial success, that defendant copied plaintiff’s product and made and sold products embodying the invention of plaintiff’s patent, thereby infringing the patent. The complaint asks for an accounting. The answer denies infringement .and denies the validity of the patent. It sets up a counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement.

Defendant objects…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wabash Photolamp Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Molinaro v. Lafayette Radio ElectronicsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API