In re Paul O.

Opinion

The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental *479rights as to his minor child, Paul O.1 On appeal, the respondent challenges as clearly erroneous the court’s findings that (1) the department of children and families (department) made reasonable efforts to reunite the child with him and (2) the respondent was unwilling or unable to benefit from the department’s services to facilitate his reunification with the child. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Certain facts and the procedural history are not in dispute. Paul was bom in February,…