Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Strange v. King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1959No. 8 Div. 969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

The appeal is by the State of Alabama from a judgment entered in a condemnation proceeding.

Submission here was on the merits and on motions of appellee to strike the assignment of errors to strike the State’s brief and to strike the transcript of the record.

The motion to strike the assignment of errors is well taken and disposes of this appeal. The other motions need not he considered.

Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, provides in part as follows:

“In assigning errors, it shall be sufficient to state concisely, in writing, in what the error consists. Such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunter v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Doe ex dem. Rowe v. GoetchiusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Pugh v. HardmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. GivinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Moon v. Butler & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starnes v. BrassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Thompson v. City of FlorenceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API