Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Lockwood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2006No. A05-1372Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

In this wrongful-death action, the district court denied appellants’ summary-judgment motion premised on the contention that a verdict favorable to appellants in a prior subrogation action by respondent’s decedent’s insurer collaterally es-tops respondent from relitigating causal negligence in this lawsuit. The court certified as important and doubtful the question of whether respondent or respondent’s decedent was in privity with the insurer in the subrogation action so as to make collateral estoppel applicable. We answer the question in the negative.

FACTS

While Richard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of TeachingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Brunsoman v. SeltzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Miller v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API