In Re Lear Corp. Shareholder Litigation
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
I. Introduction
In this case, stockholder plaintiffs seek to hold the board of Lear Corporation (“Lear” or “the company”) responsible in damages for agreeing to pay a bidder a termination fee payable upon a no vote on a merger in exchange for that bidder increasing its bid from the original merger agreement by $1.25 per share (“the Merger”). The bidder did not face competition from a rival bidder; in fact, Lear had been fully shopped, and no topping bid had emerged. Rather, in a frothy M & A market, stockholders perceived that the original merger price of $36 per…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In Re Dollar Thrifty Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.