Legal Opinion

In Re Lear Corp. Shareholder Litigation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 2, 2008No. C.A. 2728-VCSPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

I. Introduction

In this case, stockholder plaintiffs seek to hold the board of Lear Corporation (“Lear” or “the company”) responsible in damages for agreeing to pay a bidder a termination fee payable upon a no vote on a merger in exchange for that bidder increasing its bid from the original merger agreement by $1.25 per share (“the Merger”). The bidder did not face competition from a rival bidder; in fact, Lear had been fully shopped, and no topping bid had emerged. Rather, in a frothy M & A market, stockholders perceived that the original merger price of $36 per…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  5. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  3. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  4. In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. In Re Dollar Thrifty Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API