Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. v. Sampsell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1945No. 10721PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

On January 2, 1941, Charles B. Stratton contracted with General Electric Company to make certain alterations in that company’s factory building at Ontario, California. On January 3, 1941, Stratton and appellant, American Surety Company of New York, executed a bond reading as follows:

“Know All Men by These Presents: That We, C. B. Stratton, doing business as the Stratton Construction Company as principal, and American Surety Company of New York, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, and duly authorized to transact business under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Jenkins v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. of NY v. SampsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. In Re HallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API