Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Stowe-Woodward, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1940No. 8212PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Stowe-Woodward, Inc., appellee, sued The Cincinnati Rubber Manufacturing Company, appellant, for infringement of Claims 1, 2 and 7 of Woodward Reissue Patent No. 18,111, June 23, 1931. The District Court held the claims valid and infringed. The defenses relied upon here are: Lack of invention; non-infringement; anticipation; and invalidity, for ineffectiveness of the disclaimer, and of the reissue.
The patent is for a “roll” and is in the paper making art. Paper stock in its first stage is ninety-nine per cent water and about one-half of one per cent fiber. This mixture is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Maytag Co. v. Hurley MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- National Battery Co. v. Richardson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Milcor Steel Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Acme Highway Products Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. The D. S. Brown Company and Delmont D. Brown, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.