Legal Opinion
Acme Highway Products Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. The D. S. Brown Company and Delmont D. Brown, Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1970No. 19952_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, of an action instituted by Acme Highway Products Corporation [“Acme”] against the D. S. Brown Company and Mr. Del-mont D. Brown, charging the latter with infringement of Acme’s patent on a preformed, neoprene device for sealing expansion seams and joints in highways. Brown and the Brown Company counterclaimed charging: that the patent was invalid; that Brown was a co-inventor and therefore entitled to manufacture, use, and sell the device; that by concealing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Shields v. Halliburton Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Acme Highway Products Corporation v. The D. S. Brown Company and Delmont D. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.