United States v. Simon Wrecking, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
This is a cost recovery action filed by the United States against defendants Simon Wrecking and Simon Resources (“Simon”) under CERCLA section 107. The United States seeks recovery of past and future response costs incurred at the Mal-vern Superfund Site. The United States has moved for partial summary judgment on liability, arguing that since Simon was found liable under CERCLA section 113 in an earlier contribution case for pollution at the same site, Simon is now from now estopped from relitigating its liability. Simon has filed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.