Legal Opinion

Hepler v. Urban

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1988No. 146 E.D. Appeal Docket 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to strike or open a summary judgment entered by default, where the petition to strike or open was filed six months after the order granting summary judgment was entered without an indication on the docket of service of the order on the opposing party.

In 1978, appellant, Mable Hepler, filed an action to quiet title against appellees, Anthony J. Urban and Susan I. Urban, his wife, in the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County. Appellees had claimed a large portion of appellant’s real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Yeaple v. YeapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Frazier v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hepler v. UrbanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Com. v. Mora, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Eastcoast Financial v. Yelverton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API