Legal Opinion
Paranko v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 27, 1986No. 12631PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The principal issue raised on this appeal is whether, under the specific terms of a collective bargaining agreement between the state and an employee union, General Statutes § 52-4101 grants an *53individual union member standing to bring an action to compel the state to submit to arbitration. The plaintiff, Michael J. Paranko, an employee of the state and member of the Protective Services Employees Coalition IUPA/IAFF, AFL-CIO (union), brought an action in the Superior Court against the state to compel arbitration of a grievance. The complaint alleged that he had been unfairly demoted and that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Black-Clawson Company, Inc., Paper MacHine Division v. International Association of MacHinists Lodge 355, District 137, and Theodore A. BestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City of Milford v. Local 1566Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Labbe v. Pension CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gaudet v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.