Legal Opinion
Ruder v. Ohio Valley Wholesale, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 2000No. 82A05-9909-CV-402PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge
Case Summary
Appellant, Thomas A. Ruder, appeals the trial court’s denial of his request for specific performance to purchase a particular lot of the Pine Lake Estates Subdivision (Lot 20) and its grant of declaratory judgment to Ohio Valley Wholesale, Inc. (Ohio Valley) with respect to Lot 20 and another plat Lot 19. We find that Ruder fulfilled the conditions precedent to the contract, did not have unclean hands and that the purchase agreements were executed before any covenants or restrictions were recorded. Therefore, we reverse. 1
Facts and Procedural History
The facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Claise v. BernardiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lenman v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shriner v. SheehanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Coppolillo v. CortIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kesler v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- UFG, LLC v. Southwest Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.