Legal Opinion
Sorenson Transportation Co. v. State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1985No. 2639; 2641PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs own land in Guilford that can be reached only by crossing the railroad tracks at a crossing known as Sawpit Road, a dirt road. In January, 1983, the defendant state of Connecticut extinguished the plaintiffs’ rights to cross and assessed the damages of the plaintiffs Floyd and Florence Hunter at $31,200 and the damages of the plaintiff Sorenson Transportation Company (hereinafter Sorenson) at $2200. The plaintiffs, claiming they had not been awarded just damages, appealed to the Superior Court from the statements of compensation. The matters were referred to a state trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kneeland v. New England Merchants National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Manning v. MichaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Feigenbaum v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Munn v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Di Diego v. ZarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Branigan v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Town of Newington v. Estate of YoungConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.