Legal Opinion

Fulton v. . Waddell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Tbe question is tbis: Under a devise of land for life and at tbe death of tbe life tenant, to be “equally divided between all my children then living or their heirs ” does tbe sole survivor of tbe children of testator take tbe entire property, or do tbe children and descendants of deceased brothers and sisters of such survivor share in tbe property?

Tbe true answer to tbe question, gathered from decisions in point, may be stated in three propositions, to wit: (1) Tbe remainder is contingent. Starnes v. Hill, 112 N. C., 1; Whitesides v. Cooper, 115 N. C., 570; Bowen v. Hackney, 136 N. C., 187;.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Cooley v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Bell v. . GillamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Van Winkle v. . BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Weill v. . WeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API