State v. Wolfrum
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Edward John Wolfram was convicted of perjury for falsely describing his credentials while giving testimony as an expert witness in a criminal trial. On appeal, he contends that he should receive a new trial because the jury instructions were confusing and inconsistent with the language of the charging information. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
In 2000, Wolfram testified as an expert witness on behalf of a defendant in a Cassia County criminal ease. He testified that in his opinion, an audio recording upon which the State relied as evidence of the defendant’s guilt had been altered by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PhillipsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GroveIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- 45712 State v. GiltzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- Estate of David Spieker, by its Administrator, Diana Spieker, and Diana Spieker, individually v. Catholic Health Initiatives - Iowa Corp d/b/a Mercyone Des Moines Surgical Group and Dennis Witmer, D.O.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
- Marlene Banwart and Richard Banwart v. Neurosurgery of North Iowa, P.C., David Beck, M.D., and Thomas Getta, M.D.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2025
- State v. Dennis R. HeilmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.