United States v. Ringgold
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the question whether, after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion or commit procedural error in declining to consider such a disparity. Additionally, we hold that the sentence imposed by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Rodolfo TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Joe ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Clayton HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Lam Hoang LaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.