Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 11, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Gerald Rose appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) convicting him of attempted gross sexual assault and unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 253, 255 (Supp.1992). On appeal, Rose contends that the State improperly invited the jury to draw an adverse inference from Rose’s presence at trial. Because Rose failed to move for a mistrial following the trial court’s curative instructions, we review for obvious error and finding none, we affirm.

Rose argues that the State violated his sixth amendment right to confront…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PomerleauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. State v. GordiusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  4. State v. SaucierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. State v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State v. WalshHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. WinchenbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API