Johnson v. Martin
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered March 12, 1914, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, upon findings in favor of the mortgagor upon an issue with interveners, claiming the mortgagor’s interest.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This case comes to us upon an agreed statement of facts which we shall epitomize. Respondent H. S. Martin was a contractor engaged in building houses. He and his wife, Ellen Martin, were the owners of property described as lots 1, & and 3, block 57, Salmon ,Bay Park addition to the city of Seattle. The property had been mortgaged to respondent Conrad Johnson. Thereafter Martin entered into a contract to build a dwelling house for the appellant J. S. Elliott in consideration of the sum of $7,800, and agreed to pay for the labor and material and to deliver the premises free and clear of all…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Johnson v. RiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Salmon Falls Bank v. LeyserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Western Steel Casting Co. v. EdlandWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Netherlands American Mortgage Bank v. GrafkeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Pickens County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934