Legal Opinion

Collar v. Austin

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided February 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-0349-WS-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for relief under Rule 56(d). (Doc. 21). The parties have filed briefs and other materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 21, 23, 31-33), and the motion is ripe for resolution.1

The plaintiffs’ decedent (“Collar”) was a student at the University of South Alabama (“the University”) when, on the night of October 5-6, 2012, he was shot and killed by the defendant, a police officer employed by the University. Count One, brought pursuant to Section 1983, claims the defendant used excessive…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Kim D. Lee v. Luis FerraroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Terri Vinyard v. Steve WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Howell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API