Legal Opinion

Domeier v. Golling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1954No. 36,233Published

1Opinion of the Court

243 Minn. 237 (1954)

HENRY C. DOMEIER

v.

RICHARD A. GOLLING.[1]

No. 36,233.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 3, 1954.

Somsen & Somsen, for appellant.

J.A.A. Burnquist, Attorney General, and Joseph J. Bright, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

CHRISTIANSON, JUSTICE.

Plaintiff, a resident, freeholder, and taxpayer of the city of Sleepy Eye, brings this action to enjoin Richard A. Golling, public examiner of the state of Minnesota, from conducting an examination of the books, records, accounts, and affairs of said city pursuant to a freeholder's petition filed in his office on February 16,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Slingerland v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Jefferson Highway Transportation Co. v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Streissguth v. GeibSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API