Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Crookshanks
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1974No. Civ. 43139PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In this appeal attacking a writ of execution for unpaid child support and attorney’s fees, appellant contends that: (1) the interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage upon which the writ is based is invalid; (2) the failure of the court to provide appellant the opportunity for a hearing prior to the issuance of the writ constitutes a deprivation of property without due process of law as delineated in Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 [23 L.Ed.2d 349, 89 S.Ct. 1820], and Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 Cal.3d 536 [96 Cal.Rptr. 709, 488 P.2d 13]; and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Atwell v. AtwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ganschow v. GanschowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Gonzalez v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wyshak v. WyshakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of PilcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995