Legal Opinion

Preston v. Ross

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1951No. 34153PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is a suit wherein R. S. Ross and his wife, C. M. Ross, as plaintiffs, seek to quiet their title to an undivided 30-acre mineral interest in a 320-acre tract of land in Payne county, Oklahoma, as against W. A. Preston and his wife, Margaret Preston, defendants. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The uncontroverted facts are that this half section of land was owned in fee by one C. A. McKenzie and, in about 1938, the land was drilled for oil but the well was dry. Through the efforts of plaintiffs and defendants, an agreement to drill a well upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Johnson v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Melton v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Dodd v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hitt v. HittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Pfleider v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Colbourn v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. McCall v. DuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Brannan v. Sohio Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API