Legal Opinion

Melton v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1933No. 21578PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsbokx, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Seminole county by Joe Melton against E. W. Whitney and 'numerous other defendants, to cancel certain conveyances of real estate.

The cause came on for trial, and at the conclusion of the evidence the court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial •court.

The record shows that on March '26, 191Í). plaintiff eutered into a contract to purchase from one Dr. J. N. Harber certain real estate described as:

“An undivided five-sixths interest in the south half of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Thomas v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. McKay v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Cull v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Goins v. MerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Pfleider v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Preston v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Fortson Investment Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API