Legal Opinion

Pohl v. Bailey Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. 97-349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Cheryl L. Pohl (Pohl) claims that the Worker’s Compensation Medical Commission was without jurisdiction to hear her claim because she was injured prior to the date the Medical Commission came into effect. Because the legislature has clearly announced its intent that the Medical Commission hear all medically contested cases regardless of the date of the injury, we reject this contention. Further, we conclude the Worker’s Compensation Division acted in accordance with the law when it employed a ease review physician to review Pohl’s disputed impairment ratings. ' ■

We…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of French v. Amax Coal WestWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Edgcomb v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. WW Enterprises, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of Bruns v. TW Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re PohlWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. WrightWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Hurt v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API