Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. City of Youngstown
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 2012No. 2011-0621Published
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Lawrence v. Youngstown, 133 Ohio St.3d 174,
2012-Ohio-4247.] LAWRENCE, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Lawrence v. Youngstown, 133 Ohio St.3d 174,
2012-Ohio-4247.] Employment law—R.C. 4123.90—Retaliatory discharge for workers’ compensation filing—Exception to 90-day notice requirements—Judgment reversed and cause remanded. (No. 2011-0621—Submitted January 17, 2012—Decided September 20, 2012.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 09 MA 189,
2011-Ohio-998. __________________ CUPP, J. {¶ 1} No employer shall discharge an employee because the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jakischa v. Central Parcel ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mechling v. K-Mart Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lawrence v. YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lawrence v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 2012