Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2012No. 2011-0621PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} No employer shall discharge an employee because the employee filed a claim or participated in a proceeding under the workers’ compensation act for an injury or occupational disease that occurred in the course of and arising out of employment. R.C. 4123.90. That statute places certain time-specific obligations on a discharged employee who wishes to sue an employer for discharging him or her for filing a workers’ compensation claim. In particular, the statute provides that no retaliation claim may be maintained unless the employer receives written notice of the alleged violation of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mechling v. K-Mart Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lawrence v. YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Lawrence v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API