Legal Opinion
Clark v. Bonded Adjustment Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 3, 2001No. 00CV394PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
VAN SICKLE, Chief Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Michael Kinkley represents the plaintiffs. Jeffrey Hasson represents the defendants.
SUMMARY
Plaintiff claims that defendants Bonded Adjustment Company (“Bonded”) and Bonded manager Dennis Dillin violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), and Washington state law when Bonded attempted to collect an inflated process-service fee as part of a debt. The issues presented on this motion are whether the plaintiffs filed their…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Mangum v. Action Collection Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Maxwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Camarie Mangum v. Action Collection Service, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.