Legal Opinion
Mangum v. Action Collection Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 2009No. 08-35191PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Camarie Mangum appeals the district court’s determination that her action against Bonneville Billing & Collections, Inc. (“Bonneville”), under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) 1, was barred by the statute of limitations2 and that the discovery rule doctrine could not apply as a matter of law. That led to a grant of summary judgment3 against her.4
Mangum also appeals the district court’s determinations that she had not shown a right to relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against the City of Pocatello, Idaho, or Captain Don Furu based upon alleged violations of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rotkiske v. KlemmSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harper v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rotkiske v. Paul Klemm, Esq., Dba Nudelman, Klemm & Golub, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.