Legal Opinion

United States v. Fenton

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided April 21, 1939No. 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

The United States brought this suit to condemn certain lands for a canal right of way. The State of Idaho appeared and asserted that it held three mortgages on a portion of the land condemned and that the funds represented by the mortgages are endowment funds of the State. The sum of $15,924.50 was deposited with the Clerk, by the United States to be disbursed by the Court to the parties according to their interest in the fund. The defendant Fenton, Trustee, presented an application to distribute the. fund to the claims set forth in the application and to *817disallow the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Woods County v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Newton v. WeilerMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Oklahoma Education Ass'n, Inc. v. NighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Moon v. State Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Idaho ex rel. Moon v. State Board of ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API