Legal Opinion
Miller v. Holzmann
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 25, 2006No. Civil Action No. 95-1231 (RCL/JMF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending and ready for resolution is Relator Richard F. Miller’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendant Bill L. Harbert and Memorandum in Support Thereof For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied.
Rule 33(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that interrogatories be answered in writing under oath and signed by the person making them. The defendant Bill Harbert has not signed his because he has been diagnosed with dementia. According to the neuropsychologist who is treating him, he also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Joseph C. Steffan v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Peterson v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Caldwell v. Center for Correctional Health & Policy Studies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. YeagerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. MassiminoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Sandra Tomlinson, et al. v. United Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025