Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Elkins

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 2, 1946No. 3565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

I. The first question transferred is “Has the petitioner

authority to exercise the discretion with respect to investment conferred upon the former trustee who was the executor named in the will?” The original trustee was given “full power at any time to invest and reinvest and full power as to the character of the investments” of the fund of $8,000. When the settlor, as was the case here, fails to specify that successor trustees may exercise the powers conferred upon the original trustee, such powers can properly be exercised by successor trustees, when they are “not of a character leading to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brahmey v. RollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  2. Hanford v. ClancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Fowler v. HancockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. Upton v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  5. Wolfman v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butt v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Industrial National Bank v. BudlongSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Wilcox v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API