Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Gentry

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 28, 1993No. 68,401Published

1Opinion of the Court

Brewster, J.:

Ron and Nancy Wilcox appeal from the trial court’s decision holding that any payments made by the trustee of the Frank Gentry Trust, a discretionary trust, which are made for the benefit of Isabell Gentry and not paid directly to Isabell, are not subject to garnishment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

At issue is whether the trustee of a discretionary trust that does not contain a spendthrift clause is required, under a garnishment order, to pay a judgment creditor all sums which may be paid for the benefit of the beneficiary.

The trust provision in dispute provides:

“(e) One…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. Matter of Sand v. BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. First National Bank v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API