Legal Opinion

Woodbridge Partners Group, Inc. v. Ohio Lottery Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1994No. Nos. 94APE06-872, 94APE06-923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Close, Judge.

Appellants/cross-appellees, Woodbridge Partners Group, Inc. (“Woodbridge”) and David F. Banks, appeal from the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, awarding summary judgment in favor of appellees/cross-appellants, Ohio Lottery Commission, Virgil E. Brown, and John Does One through Ten.

The underlying facts are as follows: On September 14, 1991, Banks won $1,600,000 in the Ohio Super Lotto. On September 16, 1991, Banks claimed his prize and elected to receive twenty annual disbursements of $62,000, as opposed to a lump sum of cash. Thereafter, seeking immediate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Morris v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Peters v. Ohio State Lottery CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Carroll v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Meyers v. Ohio State Lottery CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. Struna v. Convenient Food MartOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Cosby v. Franklin Cty. Dept. of Job Family Servs., 07ap-41 (12-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Belinky v. Drake Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re KeimUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API