Legal Opinion

David Uriel-Ramirez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided October 31, 2012No. 08-11-00132-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice.

Appellant, David Uriel-Ramirez, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

By indictment, Appellant was charged with possession with intent to deliver cocaine (Count I), and possession of marijuana (Count II). Appellant filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence in which he asserted that the search of his business, which led to the discovery of the cocaine and marijuana, was effected without a warrant, without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, and without valid consent.

At the suppression hearing, Detective Thomas…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Melissa Caffey v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API