Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 3, 2003No. 228,2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:. In this appeal from the Superior Court, we again address a claim of prosecutorial misconduct occurring during summation to a jury. We conclude that the prosecutor’s “concession” to the jury that the State “probably” had not provided sufficient evidence to establish four of the eight theft charges submitted to the jury constituted an admission that the State had not presented a prima facie case as to those charges. In view of that concession, the appropriate course was to decline further prosecution of those charges. We further conclude that it was error for the trial judge to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Revel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API