Legal Opinion

Kelly Well Co. v. Kirschke Concrete Well Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1926No. 7237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska, confirming a master’s report and dismissing the plaintiff’s bill. Kelly Well Company, a Nebraska corporation, plaintiff, filed its bill against Kirsehke Concrete Well Company, an Arizona corporation, and Oscar R. Kirsehke, in substance alleging that William Kelly was the-original and first inventor of a certain new and useful improvement in well points and well screens and had obtained on February 19, 1918, letters patent of the United States, numbered No. 1,256,906;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dederick v. FoxU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Boston Pneumatic Power Co. v. Eureka Patents Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1905
  3. Gold & Silver Ore Separating Co. v. United States Disinte-Grating Ore Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1869
  4. Donner v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Inc. v. O. M. Franklin Blackleg Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Hookless Fastener Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Kamau v. ErtifaiDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API