Legal Opinion
Boston Pneumatic Power Co. v. Eureka Patents Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided July 6, 1905No. 2,022PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. Suit to annul patent.
1Opinion of the Court
EOWEFF, Circuit Judge.
This was a bill in equity, brought under Rev. St. § 4918 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3394], to annul claims 1, 2, 3, and 4 of letters patent No. 710,291, issued to Moran, as being in interference with claim 1 of Fetters patent No. 673,922, to Nolan. The claims are as follows:
Nolan: “(1) In a pumping system for beer or other liquids, a plurality ■of barrels or receptacles, a source of pneumatic pressure, a main-pressure pipe leading from said source and communicating with' all the receptacles in use, an outlet-pipe leading from each receptacle, a supplemental-pressure pipe…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1890
- Stonemetz Printers' Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
- Garratt v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glade v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Dittgen v. Racine Paper Goods Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
- Kelly Well Co. v. Kirschke Concrete Well Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939